Продумайте это эссе типа opinion о технологиях по идеям и плану ниже, напишите его на таймере за 40 минут, а потом сравните с образцом ответа на band 8.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Artificial intelligence will make many human workers unnecessary, so governments should limit its use in the workplace.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Это тренировочный вопрос в стиле экзамена, его написал GoPrep. Официальным вопросом IELTS он не является.
Возьмите два-три пункта из одной или обеих колонок. Все не нужны, а собственные примеры ценятся выше заученных.
Первые несколько минут потратьте на план, потом пишите.
0 слов из минимума 250
Ответ остаётся только на этой странице. Скопируйте его, прежде чем уйти.
Сначала напишите свой ответ, потом сравните: как образец отвечает именно на этот вопрос, что делает каждый абзац и какие фразы можно взять себе.
Some people fear that artificial intelligence will make many workers redundant and therefore argue that governments should restrict its use at work. I disagree with this view, although I accept that the risks to certain jobs are real.
It is true that AI can already perform many routine tasks faster and more cheaply than humans, such as processing invoices, answering simple customer queries or sorting parcels. Clerks, call-centre staff and warehouse workers could lose their positions, and the hardship for those families and towns would be serious. Governments are right to take this seriously and to monitor the speed of change.
Nevertheless, limiting the technology would be a mistake. Firms that adopt AI become more productive, and the resulting growth creates demand for new roles, just as the arrival of computers produced careers in software, data analysis and online marketing that nobody had imagined before. Rather than restrict AI, governments should invest in retraining so that displaced workers can move into these areas. Countries such as Singapore already fund individual learning accounts that allow adults to study new skills throughout their careers. Moreover, a ban in one country would simply let competitors who use AI freely gain an advantage, leaving local businesses weaker and jobs even more at risk.
AI can also remove dangerous or dull tasks, freeing people to concentrate on work that needs creativity, empathy and judgement, such as teaching, nursing and design. Machines still struggle with these human qualities.
In conclusion, artificial intelligence will undoubtedly change the labour market, but the best response is education and support for workers, not legal limits on the technology. I therefore disagree with the proposal.
| Фраза | Значение |
|---|---|
| job displacement | workers losing jobs to machines |
| automation | using machines in place of people |
| productivity gains | more output per worker |
| reskilling | learning new skills for new work |
| regulate | control by rules |
| technological unemployment | job loss caused by technology |
Отвечайте на случайные вопросы Part 1, 2 и 3 под таймер, как на экзамене.
Среднее из четырёх баллов по навыкам, округлённое так, как округляет IELTS.
Сравните балл IELTS с баллами TOEFL, Duolingo и PTE и уровнями CEFR.
Узнайте, какой балл IELTS требует университет, и где это написано.