Rencanakan esai opinion tentang teknologi ini dengan ide dan kerangka di bawah, tulis dengan timer 40 menit, lalu bandingkan dengan contoh jawaban band 8.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Artificial intelligence will make many human workers unnecessary, so governments should limit its use in the workplace.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Soal latihan ini ditulis oleh GoPrep dengan gaya ujian. Ini bukan soal resmi IELTS.
Pilih dua atau tiga poin dari satu atau kedua kolom. Kamu tidak perlu semuanya, dan contohmu sendiri dinilai lebih baik daripada contoh hafalan.
Gunakan beberapa menit pertama untuk membuat rencana, lalu mulai menulis.
0 kata dari minimal 250
Jawabanmu hanya ada di halaman ini. Salin sebelum kamu meninggalkannya.
Tulis jawabanmu sendiri dulu, lalu bandingkan: bagaimana contoh ini menjawab soal yang persis sama, apa fungsi setiap paragraf, dan frasa mana yang bisa kamu pakai.
Some people fear that artificial intelligence will make many workers redundant and therefore argue that governments should restrict its use at work. I disagree with this view, although I accept that the risks to certain jobs are real.
It is true that AI can already perform many routine tasks faster and more cheaply than humans, such as processing invoices, answering simple customer queries or sorting parcels. Clerks, call-centre staff and warehouse workers could lose their positions, and the hardship for those families and towns would be serious. Governments are right to take this seriously and to monitor the speed of change.
Nevertheless, limiting the technology would be a mistake. Firms that adopt AI become more productive, and the resulting growth creates demand for new roles, just as the arrival of computers produced careers in software, data analysis and online marketing that nobody had imagined before. Rather than restrict AI, governments should invest in retraining so that displaced workers can move into these areas. Countries such as Singapore already fund individual learning accounts that allow adults to study new skills throughout their careers. Moreover, a ban in one country would simply let competitors who use AI freely gain an advantage, leaving local businesses weaker and jobs even more at risk.
AI can also remove dangerous or dull tasks, freeing people to concentrate on work that needs creativity, empathy and judgement, such as teaching, nursing and design. Machines still struggle with these human qualities.
In conclusion, artificial intelligence will undoubtedly change the labour market, but the best response is education and support for workers, not legal limits on the technology. I therefore disagree with the proposal.
| Frasa | Arti |
|---|---|
| job displacement | workers losing jobs to machines |
| automation | using machines in place of people |
| productivity gains | more output per worker |
| reskilling | learning new skills for new work |
| regulate | control by rules |
| technological unemployment | job loss caused by technology |
Jawab pertanyaan acak Part 1, 2, dan 3 dengan timer ujian.
Rata-rata band dari empat skill, dibulatkan dengan cara IELTS membulatkannya.
Bandingkan band IELTS dengan skor TOEFL, Duolingo, dan PTE serta level CEFR.
Cari skor IELTS yang diminta universitas, lengkap dengan sumbernya.