Продумайте это эссе типа discussion о здоровье по идеям и плану ниже, напишите его на таймере за 40 минут, а потом сравните с образцом ответа на band 8.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that healthcare should be provided entirely by the government. Others believe that private hospitals and insurance are better.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Это тренировочный вопрос в стиле экзамена, его написал GoPrep. Официальным вопросом IELTS он не является.
Возьмите два-три пункта из одной или обеих колонок. Все не нужны, а собственные примеры ценятся выше заученных.
Первые несколько минут потратьте на план, потом пишите.
0 слов из минимума 250
Ответ остаётся только на этой странице. Скопируйте его, прежде чем уйти.
Сначала напишите свой ответ, потом сравните: как образец отвечает именно на этот вопрос, что делает каждый абзац и какие фразы можно взять себе.
Some people think that healthcare should be provided entirely by the government, while others believe that private hospitals and insurance are better. I will discuss both views and then give my own opinion.
Supporters of public provision argue that health is a basic human right and should not depend on income. A state-run system funded through taxes ensures that everyone, including the poor, elderly and unemployed, can receive treatment without worrying about the cost. It also allows governments to plan services nationally, focus on prevention and control prices of medicines and procedures. The United Kingdom's National Health Service, for example, provides care that is free at the point of use, and this prevents people from facing bankruptcy because of illness.
Advocates of private healthcare, however, stress efficiency and choice. Competition between hospitals and insurers can lead to shorter waiting times, modern equipment and better service, whereas state systems are often criticised for long queues and bureaucracy. Patients who can afford it may choose their own doctors and receive faster treatment, and private care also reduces the pressure on public hospitals by treating those who pay. Because private providers must satisfy their customers, they have an incentive to innovate and improve quality.
In my opinion, a mixed system is the most sensible. The government should guarantee universal access to essential and emergency care, so that nobody is denied treatment because of poverty, while allowing private providers to offer additional services and to compete in non-urgent areas. Strong regulation is needed to ensure that private companies do not exploit patients or take staff away from the public sector.
In conclusion, public healthcare promotes fairness, and private healthcare offers speed and choice, and I believe that a combination, with a strong public foundation, serves the population best.
| Фраза | Значение |
|---|---|
| universal healthcare | care for everyone |
| private insurance | paid health cover |
| state-funded | paid for by government |
| medical bills | costs of treatment |
| quality of care | standard of treatment |
| two-tier system | public and private care together |
Отвечайте на случайные вопросы Part 1, 2 и 3 под таймер, как на экзамене.
Среднее из четырёх баллов по навыкам, округлённое так, как округляет IELTS.
Сравните балл IELTS с баллами TOEFL, Duolingo и PTE и уровнями CEFR.
Узнайте, какой балл IELTS требует университет, и где это написано.