Bu transport haqidagi opinion essesini quyidagi g‘oyalar va reja yordamida rejalang, 40 daqiqalik taymer bilan yozing, so‘ng band 8 namunaviy javob bilan solishtiring.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Public transport should be free for everyone in order to reduce traffic and pollution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Bu mashq savolini GoPrep imtihon uslubida yozgan. U rasmiy IELTS savoli emas.
Bir yoki ikkala ustundan ikki-uchta fikrni tanlang. Hammasi kerak emas, o‘z misollaringiz esa yodlanganlaridan yaxshiroq baholanadi.
Dastlabki bir necha daqiqada reja tuzing, keyin yozing.
0 so‘z (kamida 250)
Javobingiz faqat shu sahifada qoladi. Sahifadan chiqishdan oldin uni nusxalab oling.
Avval o‘z javobingizni yozing, keyin solishtiring: namuna aynan shu savolga qanday javob beradi, har bir xatboshi qanday vazifani bajaradi va qaysi iboralarni o‘zingizga olishingiz mumkin.
Some people suggest that public transport should be free so that fewer people use their cars. I partly agree with the aim, but I do not think that completely free travel is the best way to achieve it; low fares would be a wiser policy.
The case for free transport has clear merits. Removing the fare would encourage many drivers to leave their cars at home, easing congestion and cutting emissions. It would also help low-income families, students and the unemployed, who currently spend a significant part of their income on getting to work or school. The city of Tallinn, for example, has offered free travel to residents for years and reported greater mobility among poorer groups, as well as fewer cars in the centre.
However, there are serious practical difficulties. Fares usually cover a considerable share of operating costs, and if they disappear, the money must come from taxes, which could mean cuts to schools or hospitals. With less income, services may deteriorate, leading to crowded vehicles, fewer routes and poorer maintenance, and that would discourage people from using them. Free travel may also attract people who would otherwise walk or cycle, which is healthier and cleaner, rather than drivers. Research suggests that the quality of service, in terms of frequency, speed and reliability, matters more to car owners than the price.
A better solution is to keep fares low and offer generous discounts to students, pensioners and people on low incomes, while investing the revenue in improving the network.
In conclusion, free public transport would have social and environmental benefits, but the cost and the risk of declining quality are significant. I therefore believe that affordable, high-quality services are more effective than making travel free.
| Ibora | Ma’nosi |
|---|---|
| fare | price of a ticket |
| subsidise | support with public money |
| commuter | person who travels to work |
| overcrowding | too many people in a space |
| modal shift | change to different transport types |
| infrastructure | basic physical systems |
Imtihon taymeri bilan tasodifiy Part 1, 2 va 3 savollariga javob bering.
To‘rt ko‘nikma balining o‘rtachasi, IELTS qanday yaxlitlasa, shunday yaxlitlangan.
IELTS balini TOEFL, Duolingo va PTE ballari hamda CEFR darajalari bilan solishtiring.
Universitet so‘raydigan IELTS balini manbasi bilan toping.