Bu atrof-muhit haqidagi advantages and disadvantages essesini quyidagi g‘oyalar va reja yordamida rejalang, 40 daqiqalik taymer bilan yozing, so‘ng band 8 namunaviy javob bilan solishtiring.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
National parks and nature reserves now charge tourists high fees and allow thousands of visitors each year.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Bu mashq savolini GoPrep imtihon uslubida yozgan. U rasmiy IELTS savoli emas.
Bir yoki ikkala ustundan ikki-uchta fikrni tanlang. Hammasi kerak emas, o‘z misollaringiz esa yodlanganlaridan yaxshiroq baholanadi.
Dastlabki bir necha daqiqada reja tuzing, keyin yozing.
0 so‘z (kamida 250)
Javobingiz faqat shu sahifada qoladi. Sahifadan chiqishdan oldin uni nusxalab oling.
Avval o‘z javobingizni yozing, keyin solishtiring: namuna aynan shu savolga qanday javob beradi, har bir xatboshi qanday vazifani bajaradi va qaysi iboralarni o‘zingizga olishingiz mumkin.
National parks and nature reserves increasingly charge high fees and welcome thousands of visitors each year. I think the advantages of this approach outweigh the disadvantages, if visitor numbers are properly managed.
There are clear benefits. Entrance fees provide money for rangers, trail maintenance, conservation projects and research, which many parks cannot afford from government budgets alone. Tourism also supports local communities by creating jobs for guides, drivers and hotel staff, and it gives residents a reason to protect wildlife rather than hunt or clear it for farmland. In Rwanda, for instance, expensive permits to see mountain gorillas fund conservation and have helped the gorilla population to recover. Visitors who experience nature at first hand often become more concerned about the environment and more willing to support protection efforts.
However, there are genuine harms. Large numbers of tourists can trample plants, erode footpaths, disturb animals and leave rubbish, while vehicles and hotels add pollution and noise. Animals that become used to people may change their feeding and breeding habits. High fees may also exclude local families and people on low incomes, making national heritage accessible only to wealthy visitors, and communities may resent a system in which most of the income goes elsewhere.
These problems can be reduced with careful management. Parks can limit daily numbers through permits, direct visitors along designated paths, close sensitive areas during breeding seasons and require guides in fragile places. Lower fees or free days for residents would keep parks accessible, and a fair share of revenue should be returned to nearby communities.
In conclusion, high fees and tourism provide funding, jobs and support for conservation, and since the environmental damage can be controlled through limits and planning, I believe the benefits are greater.
| Ibora | Ma’nosi |
|---|---|
| national park | protected natural area |
| ecotourism | travel that protects nature |
| visitor numbers | how many people come |
| nature reserve | land kept for wildlife |
| footpath erosion | wearing away of trails |
| wildlife disturbance | harm to animals' lives |
Imtihon taymeri bilan tasodifiy Part 1, 2 va 3 savollariga javob bering.
To‘rt ko‘nikma balining o‘rtachasi, IELTS qanday yaxlitlasa, shunday yaxlitlangan.
IELTS balini TOEFL, Duolingo va PTE ballari hamda CEFR darajalari bilan solishtiring.
Universitet so‘raydigan IELTS balini manbasi bilan toping.