Rencanakan esai discussion tentang sains ini dengan ide dan kerangka di bawah, tulis dengan timer 40 menit, lalu bandingkan dengan contoh jawaban band 8.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that scientific research should be funded and controlled by governments. Others believe that private companies should take the lead.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Soal latihan ini ditulis oleh GoPrep dengan gaya ujian. Ini bukan soal resmi IELTS.
Pilih dua atau tiga poin dari satu atau kedua kolom. Kamu tidak perlu semuanya, dan contohmu sendiri dinilai lebih baik daripada contoh hafalan.
Gunakan beberapa menit pertama untuk membuat rencana, lalu mulai menulis.
0 kata dari minimal 250
Jawabanmu hanya ada di halaman ini. Salin sebelum kamu meninggalkannya.
Tulis jawabanmu sendiri dulu, lalu bandingkan: bagaimana contoh ini menjawab soal yang persis sama, apa fungsi setiap paragraf, dan frasa mana yang bisa kamu pakai.
Some people believe that governments should fund and control scientific research, while others think private companies should lead. In my opinion, both have important roles, but governments should be responsible for the basic research that benefits everyone.
Those who support government control make a strong case. Governments can fund long-term projects that may take decades to produce results, which companies would find too risky or unprofitable. Many fundamental discoveries, such as the structure of atoms or the foundations of the internet, came from publicly funded laboratories and universities. Public ownership also ensures that results are published and shared, so that the whole of society benefits and other researchers can build on them. In areas such as public health and climate science, governments can direct research towards the needs of citizens rather than the interests of shareholders.
On the other hand, private companies bring speed, efficiency and money. Because they compete to bring products to market, they often develop practical applications quickly; the rapid creation of several coronavirus vaccines, for instance, relied heavily on pharmaceutical firms. Businesses also invest enormous sums in research that public budgets could never match, and they have a strong incentive to avoid waste. The danger is that commercial motives lead them to concentrate on profitable products, such as cosmetics, while neglecting rare diseases or keeping results secret.
For this reason, I believe the best system combines the two. Governments should fund basic science and set ethical rules, while companies develop practical applications and bring them to the public.
In conclusion, neither government nor business alone is ideal, but public funding is essential for fundamental research, with private firms playing a complementary role in turning discoveries into useful products.
| Frasa | Arti |
|---|---|
| publicly funded research | studies paid by the state |
| commercial interests | wish for profit |
| research and development | R&D, work on new products |
| patent | legal right to an invention |
| long-term project | work taking many years |
| private sector | businesses not owned by government |
Jawab pertanyaan acak Part 1, 2, dan 3 dengan timer ujian.
Rata-rata band dari empat skill, dibulatkan dengan cara IELTS membulatkannya.
Bandingkan band IELTS dengan skor TOEFL, Duolingo, dan PTE serta level CEFR.
Cari skor IELTS yang diminta universitas, lengkap dengan sumbernya.